https://www.vice.com/en_uk/video/crime-and-punishment-in-the-gaza-strip-part-1
Everything and talks about everything. The
description of the documentary says in
2007 we tried and failed to get into Gaza through the Israeli-controlled Ereaz
Crossing. Back then the rival Palestinian factions of Hamas and Fatahwere
engaged in a bloody war for control of this tiny strip of land. Hamas won. When
the post-Mubarak government of Egypt decided to start letting small numbers of
folks into Gaza through their Rafah crossing, we knew it was ochance to
finally get a rare glimpse of the embattled Gaza Strip and to see what life was
like under the rule of Hamas.
Israel and Gaza were not friendly terms as some of
the people of Israel attacked and assassinated a massive amount of people in
Gaza. Because of this Gaza lunched planes to attack Israel back. The narrator
to this didn't really get anyone’s opinion on this. This documentary was really
set on just facts. the war between nation shouldn't every happen.
The people at fault here would be some of the
people of Israel as they attacked the murdered innocent people. Gaza on the
other hand wanted to use votes, elections so the citizens choose how they live
which isn't fully just made on the governments that rules over.
I think what could have helped was the fact that
only one person in the documentary gave there opinion for a 8 minutes
documentary lacks in that but it makes for it for information instead.
The documentary only interviews two people. While the documentary doesn’t
have two separate parts it could have still have been better if it wasn't so
informative but got peoples opinion on the matter at hand.
Gaza is represented as a dangerous place as the
narrator said they could get bombed at any time simply for standing in Gaza as
people just visiting. Everyone in the documentary seems to be represented
as decent people. Close to the end of the video you see a militant group like
Alansard, which seem want revenge for what the people of Israel have done for
killing their people.
It's like the militant Alansard people
are ignorant to the fact the more people die the more suffering and war there
will just be until there's nothing left. The documentary could have honestly
looked at more positive things than just negatives which this documentary was
full of which was one sided and only really got the point of view of the people
of Gaza and not the Israel people.
In Saddam's Shadow: Baghdad 10 Years After the Invasion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLDbSvEZka6GEc-dR2PcxIRGhw5nRFPvs4&v=zhnNIhV4EsU
This is brief documentary how life is in the Saddam after a
giant war broke out. After the
war finally ended people have been happier at
Saddam and citizens feel they have more freedom. What the documentary
People in Saddam have
been getting killed for breaking from religious tradition. As such people
that are me bands and where just black clothing ect. the effect of this is
that people are getting murdered simply for dressing a certain way
which isn't seen as being appropriate along the victims being Muslim.
Police are having a hard time
actually protecting citizens as thousands and thousands and of people from
bombs being transport in to different parts. It
is repented positively at the start but over time the documentary
goes on to the negative side of things. By doing it makes the interview some
what balanced. What I think it was missing was the documentary being objective.
The documentary didn't interview anyone that was really effected by the
way this. If the documentary were to do that than it would have been
a pretty good documentary. What the documentary really did was get
peoples opinion the matter that was all subjective.
This is brief documentary how life is in the Saddam after a giant war broke out. After the war finally ended people have been happier at Saddam and citizens feel they have more freedom. What the documentary
People in Saddam have
been getting killed for breaking from religious tradition. As such people
that are me bands and where just black clothing ect. the effect of this is
that people are getting murdered simply for dressing a certain way
which isn't seen as being appropriate along the victims being Muslim.
Police are having a hard time
actually protecting citizens as thousands and thousands and of people from
bombs being transport in to different parts. It
is repented positively at the start but over time the documentary
goes on to the negative side of things. By doing it makes the interview some
what balanced. What I think it was missing was the documentary being objective.
The documentary didn't interview anyone that was really effected by the
way this. If the documentary were to do that than it would have been
a pretty good documentary. What the documentary really did was get
peoples opinion the matter that was all subjective.
No comments:
Post a Comment